BERLIN – Journalists are observers and not stakeholders at the events that they cover, regardless of whether they work in a small town in Eastern Europe or in the White House. But as journalists around the world become increasingly growing goals, many of them have thought when it can justify giving it up and talking about it – and they have come to very different conclusions.
In Germany, a group of regional correspondents decided that this point had come in May, when the German party (AfD) declared the eleventh right during a news conference that it would not be possible to ask a tabloid correspondent Return questions during the event. The excluded correspondent from the press briefer, Michael Sauerbier, had asked critical questions during an event to the previous press regarding official alleged official affiliate links to the extreme group of the right wing.
This is not the first time for the reporters to be exempt from the AfD, but with attacks requiring and running the rhetoric, every journalist in the room agreed what to do immediately. They left the room; the news conference was canceled.
If any of those present at the time watched the exchange of tests between President Trump and the correspondent Jim House, White House, CNN on Wednesday, they may have had some support for that day in May.
During a news conference on Wednesday after midday, Acosta asked if Trump had "demonic migrants" by calling an American Central immigrant "caravan". When Intern House House tried to restore the microphone, Acosta refused to lift his arm.
"I pardon me," she said to the woman.
Trump's response was less subtle. "CNN should be ashamed of it as you work for them. You're an incredible person, terrible. You should not be working for CNN. You're a very incredible person," he said. Trump at Acosta. Trump had taken into account the possibility of eliminating qualifications from journalists. "Why do we work so hard when working with the media when it's corrupt? Take complications away?" He asked on Twitter this May.
And on Wednesday, the White House appears to be following those threats for the first time, when it stopped Acosta credits seamlessly in unprecedented movement.
In other nations where very remote parties threaten democratic principles openly or where journalists are afraid of their lives, Acosta was widely celebrated on Thursday morning. He won his corresponding questions from the president of social media supporters in India, for example, where he praised some of his willingness to undertake the headmaster.
One user created a video clip contrasting the Acosta questions with a movie of an event in 2015, when Narendra Modi, the First Minister of Wales, held a holiday event for journalists – and they took advantage of it to take an identity. Modi has not held a news conference where journalists could ask questions freely during their office time.
Foreign journalists were not alone in their support for Acosta. At the news conference tested on Wednesday, Trump respondent called at the next point immediately to defend his colleague. But should US correspondents go down the path of their foreign colleagues and buckle directions?
The bar for such steps has been relatively high overseas. In one case, foreign journalists walked out of the Israeli news conference with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Australian curator Malcolm Turnbull last year after patrons ordered a search of the European Press Agency photographer. The event was later described as "unnecessary and damaging" by the Foreign Press Association of the country, and his attention was embarrassing by the Israeli government.
In the case of the German AfD event, the walk seems to have had an impact too. Recently, senior party officials held a roundtable discussion with leading editors in Germany, with the aim expressed to encourage a more moderate dialogue, although "false news" slogans have not disappeared from streets.
AfD and Trump, of course, are almost comparable. Trump has sometimes engaged with media and at other times hidden on them. He has threatened prosecution centers but has not followed, so far. In the meantime, the AfD is in opposition with a limited influence.
When that-U.S. press secretary Sean Spicer banned a number of news press releases from the camera last February but conservative announcements were invited to join, just a few media shops decided to boycott the event. The reasons for recycling the bicycle of the briefing were varied: Some argued that continuing to deal with the administration was more important than setting an example. Other, polarized, new shops seem to be proud to be favored.
In contrast, Germany has a more moderate media landscape, where publications and networks have left a bit of subtraction so far. German journalists often publish statements through joint umbrella associations when they are scared freedoms of the press, regardless of their editorial perspectives.
In response to the May event, one such society gave a clear directive to its members: "We just ask all members to attend AfD events if everyone who attends the journalists right to ask questions. "
Joanna Slater contributed to this report to New Delhi. Parts of this post were first published on May 10, 2018.
More about WorldViews:
Trump's party gets very right
Migrant Garafan: In Mexico City camp, caravan families are on a crossroads
Trump phoned Somali refugees in Minnesota. One of them won a seat in the Congress.