Monday , August 2 2021

Social: The SPD and the anard: "citizen money" instead of Hartz IV?

From the middle to the left? Although voting and Green kings conquer the center, the SPD allegations are something that many see as the root of all evil: Hartz IV. Now the SPN leader Nahles presents ideas for something new, "money for the citizen". But that is the name of the FDP concept.

If in this difficult time one can still rely on the SPD, then on the regular spirit, of the name Hartz IV.

Shortly after the start of the big coalition, Hartz's extensive debate took place in March – and now, the SPD has dropped to 14 per cent, the issue is back. And party leader Andrea Nahles sets himself at the top of the "Hartz IV must-away" movement.

Even today, the Social Democrats are suffering from the reform that chancellor Gerhard Schröder characterized and at the same time stimulated the economy, but it also costs a lot of trust and voters. It dominates the internal arguments as the theme of refugees today characterizes Chancellor Angela Merkel. This threatens to become "Hartz IV of the UDP".

Nahles has announced plans to resolve conflicts. Analyzes show that many more no longer know what the SPD stands for today. The partition in attitude to Hartz IV is symptomatic of this. "You also have to get the men to touch a little hot nails," is his motto.

She seems almost flawed after the recent debate camp, which should bring something new and better. "We'll leave Hartz IV behind," he called into the hall. The mood was equally positive in 2016 at the Congress of the Future, in 2015 there was a campaign campaign, the 2014 theme laboratories.

Little search agent is so intense for future subjects. And often ending in the past. In 8839 characters, Nahles has now written in the "Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung" on the weekend for "reforming the state of great welfare – and what should come after Hartz IV". But what's going on is still ambiguous – but this time the argument should not feed unfounded. The purposeful chairman must provide – and marvelous can be wonderful.

"We need to fund work rather than unemployment," he writes – and with minimum wages, tax repayments and social security contributions to make sure that more is still net, so that much less Citizens are dependent on basic welfare.

In particular, the two million children at the Hartz IV level are a serious concern – they should have their own child protection. And for the remainder – at present around 6 million people take advantage of the benefits of Hartz IV (standard rate: 416 euros per month) – they want to have "reasonable performance" with fewer sanctions threats.

"The benefits that often cause harassment, often have racism and experienced stigma". Nahles also wants a lot more housing allowance to stop "people being thrown into the face of greenhouses in the basic security."

In addition, like the former Hartz IV, it is a long reference to Unemployment Benefit, so long-term system users do not fall like that after a few months at the Hartz IV level. The bottom line is their offer above: much more money. You should not lower below the maintenance level, assets and income limits, such as small jobs may be more generous.

The 2010 Agenda launched by the 15 year old green coalition is inevitably partly responsible for the situation of the labor market much better today. The proposals were based on commission ideas led by former VW manager Peter Hartz. It was about more flexibility – but also an extension to the low wage sector and temporary work. Many of them became losses, and they no longer appreciate their work. And to save money, unemployment and social support, he was combined to "Hartz IV".

Is this all responsible for the fact that many citizens feel more and more dependent on the AfD and other alternatives? At the end of March, Vice-Chancellor Ultra Scholz made clarity during the last debate that Hartz IV's principle of insistence and promotion would not be shaken. This was criticized internally as "banning thinking". The momentum for the debate at the time was the head of the government of Berlin, Michael Müller, who, as an alternative to Hartz, wants a "basic income based on equality" of 1,200 euros to anyone who is willing to work for non- profit.

Now Nahles wants to overcome Hartz IV. Very little ask for a sudden left foot. It is interesting that the extensive Green fly – 23 per cent in an ARD survey, only a bit behind the UDP / CSU (26) – is done with a middle course. Schröder's mantra, which Scholz would sign up immediately, reads: "Elections are won in the middle."

Although the UDP hopes for spring with an open candidate race for the leader of the party leader, Angela Merkel, the SPD is increasingly critical of Nahles, who chairs a small arrangement, and Scholz. Here are some regular names: "Pippi Longstocking and the man of Hamburg-Mannheimer".

Even from the Schröder environment he says to the argument Hartz IV: "This is not all carved in stone." But anxiety is preparing a lot of free and unpaid parts operating. Nahles offers a "citizen season" as a new season. However, the term "citizen money" has already hijacked the FDP for their concept for a long time. And unlike Nahles, the concept aims to significantly lower social benefits. All social benefits funded by tax bundled in a complete service and in a state agency.

So far, the SPD uses the distribution of more and more billions, even on a pension subject, greatly favors the electorate. Former Chancellor's candidate, the Steinbrück Peers, recently said that SPD will only see a society ambulance, who once seals a pipe break, sometimes screwing and ensuring that the minimum wage is increase from one euro. "The welfare state has long been the border since demographic change. And the emergency signs are wetting.

But Nahles' comments are also a response to Robert Habeck's Greens leader – the SPD notes with concern how Green seeks to make a more prominent profile in social policy. But the concept previously presented by Habeck of "guaranteeing" without compulsion to look for new work is likely to be more expensive.

The main dispute in the SPD is that although they can argue, but politicians can not entertain their spirit for the time being. In the big coalition, there is hardly anything to do here. The Economist Minister Peter Altmaier (UDP) says in uncertain terms: "We can not abolish Hartz IV."

Source link