Lying is a false statement, there is no evidence in it, the author lies.
Aldis Gobzems, who is not a member of political groups, has gone to support tax cuts on the rostrum. He noted that the changes in overall support, because he believes that the overall tax burden in Latvia is too high and expressed the opinion that the problem of alcoholism can not be eliminated by changing the excise tax rate, since "those who use the most expensive alcohol are already extinct." use them cheaply – smuggling and the like. "
In the SKDS study, commissioned by Pharmacy Networks and Apothek in the pharmacy network, respondents from the Health Care Index shared their self-esteem for their health status. Alcoholism is recognized as the main problem for 6% of people, but differences in groups of people with different levels of income are not significant.
It should be noted that the Health Index is a survey or self-assessment, and not, for example, medical treatment data on alcohol treatment. The Center for Disease Prevention and Control and the Central Statistical Bureau (CSB) do not have the information available to understand how much alcoholism is related to income. However, data from the CSB show that, regardless of the money earned, residents spend an average of 3 to 5% of their alcohol and tobacco income annually.
Similarly, in the 2016 CSB survey, it was found that 31% of the people in the poorest population are experiencing at least one heavy episode per month (drinking at least six alcoholic beverages at one and the same time), and the richest – 28%.
Sharmitt Skide, head of the Riga Psychiatric and Narcological Center, says that "drug addiction does not distinguish between a rich person or a poor person." As the narcologist notes, there may be divergences in the solvency of medical services and medicines.
Stable work and support for the family are also motivated to recover more quickly. "So, perhaps, we see less effect, but the diagnosis of drug addiction is the same," says Scade. "We see alcoholic psychosis from good whiskey, from good cognac and good sneakers."
When Re: check asked to explain the statement to Gobzeme, at first he asserted that he had never spoken. He later noted that the context was misunderstood. Alcoholism is a big problem, and expensive alcohol is harmful, he said, but "alcoholics, real alcoholics, they are in fact people who do not buy good champagne for 70 euros or good vodka for 70 euros, and those who are" the cheapest, affordable, "he explained," Gobzems could not provide data to prove his words. "" Leave Riga and stop reading newspapers, look at real life, "he said.
Conclusion: The statement by Gobzma that non-wives who drink more expensive alcohol do not rely on facts.
Surveys of self-esteem of excessive consumption of alcohol are expressed by the richest and poorest in society on an equal footing. In addition, both high and low income people spend the equivalent income on alcohol and tobacco. Doctors also confirm that both expensive and cheap alcohol is toxic to the brain.